Kevin Warsh Could Be the Next Fed Chair: Here are three observations and why this may be good for your investments in hard assets.
On January 30, President Trump nominated Kevin Warsh be the next chair of the Federal Reserve, elevating him above three other finalists: 1) Rick Rieder, BlackRock’s Chief Investment Officer of Global Fixed Income; 2) Kevin Hassett, Director of the National Economic Council; and 3) Chris Waller, an economist and incumbent Fed Governor since 2020.
If confirmed by the Senate, Warsh will become the 17th chair of the nation’s central bank — succeeding Jerome Powell, whose term ends on May 15.
Warsh is no stranger to the Federal Reserve. The former Morgan Stanley financier, now 55, was first nominated to serve on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by President Bush in January 2006.
Then 35, he was the youngest Fed Governor in history — though neither his age nor his relative inexperience prevented him from playing an important role as a Wall Street liaison during the 2008 financial crisis. During the crisis, he worked closely with then-chair Ben Bernanke to find acquirers for failing investment banks, and subsequently laid the groundwork for a “macroprudential” approach to post-crisis financial reform.
As the economy started to recover, Warsh began to disagree with Bernanke and others over the continued use of quantitative easing (QE) as a means of lowering long-term interest rates and spurring economic growth, for fear that excessive liquidity could result in higher inflation.
To have Congress pass fiscal and regulatory reforms instead, he argued, was a better course of action than an approach that relied on monetary policy alone. Eager to move on, he resigned from the Board in February 2011.
If Warsh returns to the Board as chair in mid-2026, it will be more than 15 years since he was last a Fed Governor. How might he oversee monetary policy this time around? Here’s the rundown:
1. He Wants a Smaller Fed Balance Sheet
Warsh’s criticism of QE has not subsided. In a November 2025 Wall Street Journal Op-Ed, he called for a reduction in the Fed’s “bloated” balance sheet — in other words, quantitative tightening (QT) — arguing that the Fed’s $6.6 trillion worth of Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) distorts financial markets. The private credit markets, he claims, should be the arbiter of credit conditions — not the Fed.
- Why this matters for hard assets: A smaller Fed balance sheet could mean tighter liquidity and higher long-term borrowing costs. In that environment, hard assets with strong in-place cash flow and conservative leverage tend to outperform more speculative investments. Discipline matters more when liquidity is not abundant.
2. He Advocates for Lower Interest Rates (For Now)
Warsh believes that shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet could allow for that “largesse [to] be redeployed in the form of lower interest rates to support households and small and medium-size businesses.” This aligns him with the administration’s call for lower interest rates — a directive that has challenged Fed independence and stoked tensions between Powell and the President.
The market’s reaction, though, shows that investors are less confident that Warsh will bend the knee to the President’s wishes. Following his nomination, the spot price of silver plunged 28%, the steepest one-day loss since “Silver Thursday” on March 27, 1980. This move suggests that Warsh’s nominations have eased concerns about the erosion of the Federal Reserve’s independence and signals that investors may expect higher — rather than lower — interest rates once he assumes the chairmanship.
- Why this matters for hard assets: If policy rates decline while the Fed reduces its balance sheet, financing conditions may normalize without inflating asset prices. For real estate investors, this supports steady transaction activity but still rewards income growth and operational value creation over relying on falling cap rates.
3. He Remains an Inflation Hawk
Warsh’s staunch advocacy for QT, which reduces money in circulation, ultimately stems from his desire to keep a lid on inflation. Even his openness towards lower interest rates is backed by an inflation-focused rationale: supply-side productivity gains from AI, he believes, can absorb the boost in demand from lower rates — resulting in economic growth without the requisite upward pressure on prices.
- Why this matters for hard assets: A continued focus on inflation control reinforces the value of assets that generate durable income. Properties with essential tenants and structured rent increases can help preserve purchasing power in uncertain inflation environments.
What Does This Mean for Recentric?
No matter Warsh’s views on the Fed’s balance sheet, interest rates, or inflation, he will be just one of 12 voting members on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). While the chair seeks consensus, Fed Governors can and do dissent.
Aside from a diversity of views at the committee level, monetary policy actions are guided by economic data, which means that interest rates are in flux as much as the economic and geopolitical factors that inform central banking decisions. Put simply, the future path of interest rates — no matter who is Fed chair — is notoriously difficult to predict.
At Recentric, we believe stewards of capital — particularly in commercial real estate — should not rely on favorable macroeconomic tailwinds as a driver of performance. True alpha is generated during the holding period through disciplined asset management, property operations, and value creation, not through the hope of declining interest rates. While there are periods in a cycle when lower rates can provide a tailwind, timing dispositions to coincide with rate declines is difficult and unpredictable. Rather than underwriting to variables outside our control, we focus on the operational levers we can influence directly.
We look forward to showing how Recentric’s expertise as an operator helps us navigate all market landscapes on behalf of our investors.
Recentric’s portfolio continues to perform very well given the market conditions. Our team is focused on exceeding our tenants’ and their patients’/employees’ expectations and delivering strong value as an owner/operator of our portfolio.
Key Performance Indicators:
- Weighted Average Vacancy Levels: 15.16%
- Portfolio Weighted Average Lease Term WALT: 3.96 years
- Debt Service Coverage Ratio (weighted average): 1.66X
-
Loan-to-Value = Long-Term Debt / Mark-to-Market Asset Value: 51.48%





